|
Franchises,
sales territories: the internet has created the potential for conflict.
Older agreements never contemplated web sites. Today, when entering into
any agreement giving you territorial exclusivity, the conflicts which can
arise from marketing through web sites cannot be ignored.
Well
publicized conflicts include the Ford Motor Company and other vehicle
manufacturers and their dealers; drug store web sites and their franchisee
/ operator stores.
The
right to conduct business in a territory obviously is not as strong as an
exclusivity provision. However, a non-compete provision as long as the
agreement is in good standing is similar to an exclusivity provision.
In
the United States, the non-competition / exclusivity provisions have been
held to be effective against a franchisor's or distributor's virtual
store.
Today,
it can be expected that franchisors and distributors may want to reserve
the right to conduct all internet sales.
Alternately
sharing arrangements may be proposed, or the franchisor/distributor may
serve as a broker, having the franchisee take responsibility for the sale.
Issues
to be addressed, using franchises as the example, include:
-
Rights
of franchisor and franchisee to establish web sites;
-
domain
names;
-
the
use and protection of the franchisors' marks, domain and trade names
on the franchisee's site;
-
links;
-
content;
-
franchisee's
territorial sales jurisdiction.
Those
of you having existing agreements should expect that these issues will be
addressed in renewal agreements. If entering into a new agreement, it is
vital that these concerns be reviewed.
|